14 Oct 2026

Towards a competitive and sovereign Europe

  • We support the long-term objective of achieving a larger European share of the European Cloud AI & Technology market, tripling data centre capacity, joint procurement, fast permits and 25% procurement for SMEs. Success should be measured in competitive terms: best innovation, increased security and resilience, and value creation across European industry.
  • Europe should build more AI and cloud resilience and sovereignty through incentives over restrictions: EU investment programmes, integrated European capital markets, joint procurement, tax incentives, skills, simplified rules and local content targets. These should crowd in private investment from Europe and beyond, scaling competitive capabilities in areas where Europe can lead.
  • Technology sovereignty means capability, security, control and choice: building competitive European capabilities, protecting data and systems, maintaining continuity of critical operations, and preserving technology choice through open markets and allied partnerships. Sovereignty criteria should focus on security, cybersecurity, encryption, data governance, infrastructure resilience, and European organisational measures and supply-chain risk, with protection reflecting workload sensitivity. Ownership requirements should not serve as market-access preconditions but remain exceptional, and target only the most sensitive workloads in areas like national security and justice.
  • CADA should set clear guidelines. Mandatory requirements should be limited to clearly defined highly sensitive workloads in public areas like defence or justice. Not all public sector activities should be in scope by default, and CADA must not be extended to private entities. Changes to levels or scope require impact assessment and consultation. They must be decided via the EU’s ordinary legislative process, not delegated acts.
  • A single European framework must apply uniformly across all Member States, defining highly sensitive workloads consistently. The framework should be simplified, with stronger coherence with other legislation and fewer levels and requirements. National implementation must not create 27 different sovereignty regimes. Implementation should be phased over 5 years to protect investment and service continuity.
  • Europe should remain open and align criteria with allies’ sovereignty frameworks to minimise industry costs, maximise market access, prevent trade barriers and respect WTO rules.
Read the full paper here
For more information, please contact:
Julien Chasserieau
Associate Director for AI & Data Policy
Our resources on ****
09 Oct 2026 Position Paper
Future proofing electricity bills for grid investment and competitiveness
02 Oct 2026 Position Paper
How to close the funding gap to scale quantum computing in Europe
23 Jun 2026 Policy Paper
A practical path to EU-US cybersecurity mutual recognition
Hit enter to search or ESC to close
This website uses cookies
We use cookies and similar techonologies to adjust your preferences, analyze traffic and measure the effectiveness of campaigns. You consent to the use of our cookies by continuing to browse this website.
Decline
Accept