22 Dec 2020

Industry position on Fair, Transparent, and Non-discriminatory (FRAND) pricing within Ecodesign implementing measure LOT 9

DIGITALEUROPE has previously issued this interpretation in the build-up to the Regulation 2019/424/EU (LOT 9) and  had proposed this interpretation as part of a guidance document that was intended to accompany the Regulation.

Under the EU Ecodesign framework (EU 2009/125), implementing measures (Regulations) are legislated in general for vertical product categories. These Regulations set product design requirements. Under the auspices of the Circular Economy Action Plan, product requirements under Eco-design have expanded beyond the energy efficiency requirements, adding a new type of requirement referred to as material efficiency. Within this new category, making firmware upgrade (where applicable) available for free or at a ‘fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory price’, is a requirement that now appears in some of the recent electronic related implementing measures.

The approach to ‘fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory’ is not defined in these Regulations, nor in the accompanying FAQs that support these Regulations. For Regulation 2019/424/EU (LOT 9), which applies to server and data storage products, DIGITALEUROPE takes the position of interpreting ‘fair, transparent and non-discriminatory’ cost of making available the latest available version of firmware as follows:

Pricing will be regarded as “fair” if it is commercially reasonable and is otherwise consistent with EU competition law. In assessing whether prices are fair, market surveillance authorities should apply a test that is consistent with other EU policies such as competition law. Firmware updates are valuable intellectual property, which are developed with considerable investments by server and data storage suppliers. To set a “fair” price under the Regulation, server and storage product suppliers will apply their own prices and pricing methodologies for firmware updates, taking into account relevant facts including competition and the requirement to provide free security updates. These prices and pricing methodologies should not be determined in advance by the market surveillance authority. Likewise, suppliers are free to adapt their pricing from time to time as determined by their own commercial policies.

Suppliers may meet the requirement of “transparent” pricing by publishing how price estimates necessary for firmware updates can be obtained. The requirement for transparency does not require the publication of  standardised price lists but may be met by the option for customers to request personalised price estimates, which are sufficiently clear and unambiguous as to the updates covered and price to be paid.

“Non-discriminatory” pricing for accessing firmware should be determined as consistent with how prices are developed for other customers specifically seeking updates. This may result in differentiated pricing according to the customer’s specific situation and requirements. It should be considered a subordinate requirement to the “fairness” criteria.

For more information, please contact:
Raphaëlle Hennekinne
Senior Policy Manager, Sustainability
Back to Sustainability
View the complete Policy Paper
PDF
Our resources on Sustainability
Policy Paper 10 Jun 2021
DIGITALEUROPE’s supporting paper on the public consultation on the Sustainable Products Initiative
Policy Paper 12 Mar 2021
DIGITALEUROPE's position paper on the proposed Batteries Regulation
Policy Paper 09 Mar 2021
DIGITALEUROPE’s response to the Digital Decade consultation
Hit enter to search or ESC to close
This website uses cookies
We use cookies and similar techonologies to adjust your preferences, analyze traffic and measure the effectiveness of campaigns. You consent to the use of our cookies by continuing to browse this website.
Decline
Accept